On the other hand I find it exciting when a woman has a Little secret down there.Ahhhh down where? Come on man! Are you afraid to say vagina/pussy, labia menora/majora, clitoris . This is an adult website.;-)
I simply didnt want to appear rude even though we are in an adult forum.
FreeLee, I'm with you on your thoughts.
Go ahead and do whatever you want as long as it doesn't affect me.
Just don't go and tell me what I can and can't do.
If you don't like the babe with the big plastic boobs, don't sit next to her. If the dude
has too many rings in his dick to suit you, move down a bit more. If the couple has too
many tattoos then just find another spot to hang out.
Some of these people need to lighten up on the caffeine or switch to de-cafe!
Later,
Genital jewellery isnt very common in NZ as far as I know. Perhaps more common in the gay community than in general.
I can only recall several examples, one large Prince Albert piercing, several women with clitorial rings, and, slightly outside this topic, a penis tattoo, all at a naturist club.
There was a debate five years ago in the Naturist community about rings, etc. There was a strong feeling expressed that those wearing jewellery were not truly naked. The letters printed in 'Gonatural' were quite astonishing and I thought very conservative. I would feel it is up to the individual really just as shaving body hair is treated. On that last point it is rare today to see naturist club members with pubic hair. Curiously no one shaves their head.
One thing about the Prince Albert, though I suppose you are not supposed to pay attention to this kind of detail, is that it was actually quite becoming and suited his penis.
Interestingly at various hippie events where there is common nudity, such as Kiwiburn, and rainbow gatherings, I have yet to see any jewellery being worn by males. Occasionally you will see women with genitial piercings and or shaved. Those attending these events are generally in the 25-40 bracket, so it may be an age question. At the last Kiwiburn in January this year some 1100 took part on the naked run around the remains of the effigy: I saw no examples of jewellery and no instances of shaving . At the rainbow held some weeks before, there were a number of participants casually naked during the course of the day and again none were shaved and none wore jewellery.
I have a PA.I like It.I don't really care if anyone else does.I don't shave my body. I shave my head because after 70 years there isn't much there.I am very laid back and very accepting of other people and what they like or dislike.If you don't like it don't look. Little Johnny won't be traumatized for life because He saw It. For Gods sake he just saw a hot woman walk by naked. If he wants to know why tell him I have it because I like it or she doesn't like to wear anything. I would be more upset telling him why someone would go into a school and kill kids for nothing.If my PA is the most awful thing he sees in his young life then God bless him .
what would you think if your wife / girlfriend walked around nude with her stomach painted with the words "inset dick here " and an arrow pointing between her legs ? after all its just art right ?we all know better than that ,just like we all know whats on the mind of a man that walks around with his decorated dick
No, you don't. First of all, genital peicings have a variety of functions, aesthetics, sizing, and can be discrete or prominent. People peirce for many reasons. Exhibition is one of them. But not all who peirce do so to say 'screw me' (in fact, that is not the meaning of any of it, not even remotely). None of the genital peircings are for display only. They all serve a sensual or practical purpose. One, the PA is a military solution to equestrian issues and men's bodies. This is a wide cultural movement that draws on many cultures and has many facets. It's frustrating to see nudists blithely dumping an entire sector of folks as perverts when the same is done to us... out of ignorance I would add.
Suggestions that a clitoral or labia peircing equates to an invitation to barely consentual sex (insert dick here) tattooed on a woman is repulsive and completely out of line. It's frankly misogynist. You'd have us believe that no one understands genital sex function unless jewelry? The genitals are already evolved to garner the attention of suitors. It's OK to not like the practice. It's OK to ask it be excluded from nudist space.
It's not ok to make such unecessarily nasty claims without any care or concern. It's painfully obvious when a man or less frequently a woman is showing off. Swagger. Thrust. Swing. Leer. Touching. None of this is the result of genital jewelry. Those people came like that. If they are just moving through space and not doing a penile pantomime it's just metal on skin at the regular sizes.
And finally with respect to penis adornments. No, not every penis accessory means my dick wants to party all the time. Every human culture has tattooed peirced modded implanted on penises. Once you get a penis peircing you need to leave it in or it heals over. Either folks are planning their perversion well in advance or perhaps it's just a part of the whole and no big deal.
I also let women decide what to wear or not.
Actions
Back to TopicsReply to TopicShare this topic
Get paid just by sending us users/traffic.
Signup takes seconds, start now!
Signup as an affiliate!